Response to reviewers comments

We are very grateful for the reviews provided by the editors and each of the external reviewers of this manuscript. Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers. Keep in mind that the editor of a journal will receive your comments and may forward them on to reviewers. Rule 3: Accept the blame.

A well-written reply is then critical to have your paper accepted. Your response in black . We believe that their vital . Each comment has been carefully considered point by point and responded. Becoming a successful researcher in the natural sciences means responding to comments of the journal editors and reviewers in an . We thank the reviewers for their thoughtful and supportive comments. Paper title: Reverse Back-off Mechanism for Safety Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks.

Peer review is the indispensable part of publishing a scientific paper, in particulars in high-impact journals. Training programmes for scientists usually include modules on writing a scientific manuscript but rarely pay attention to dealing with comments from reviewers. This is to ensure the quality, . For further information or help in publishing a journal article with Springer.

Are you looking for suitable journals to publish in? RESPONSES TO REVIEWER COMMENTS. I think the title should be more specific. I suggest using the MeSH term EUS-FNA.

Name of journal: World Journal of Cardiology. Provide a “yes” or “no” answer. We sincerely appreciate the valuable . Here are some comments that you probably want to tell a reviewer , followed by . Examples of author responses to reviewer comments , taken mostly from the final version of the ms.

Authors should address feedback from reviewers in a response to reviewers. A response to reviewers specifies how the authors addressed each comment the . Expand commentsHide comments — Join the conversation! Opinions on Inside Higher Ed. If the editor has rejected your manuscript, there will usually be reasons given for the decision.

We appreciate you and the reviewers for your precious time in reviewing our. We agree with the reviewer that the first version of the paper was strongly lacking previous. So, as an author, what should you do if one reviewer loves your. The hope for most researchers is to receive a positive review with reviewer comments that require a response before re-submission.

We highly appreciate the detailed valuable comments of the referees on our. We have also provided a reaction energy profile shown in Figure Sbelow to clarify these points. See also response to comment 4. Reviewer comment 3:.